Wednesday, 20 June 2012

'Bonkers' Bootle Councillors' Gravy Train - 67% Pay Rises proposal!

This is a cross posting from Mike Booth over on the Kew blog

The recent news that there is a recommendation to give seven Sefton Labour councillors pay rises of between 25% and 67% has understandably provoked fury.

What has happened is that Sefton Council’s “Independent Remuneration Panel” proposed the massive increases at its meeting held on 6th June. This was the first meeting of the Panel since Labour took overall control of Sefton Council in the May local elections.

Many of us in the Lib Dems had expected the Panel to propose a cut in the level of additional Special Responsibility Allowances (SRAs) paid to 16 of the more senior councillors. In fact they did exactly the opposite.

The Panel has recommended that the Chairs of Sefton Council’s four Overview and Scrutiny Committees and of the Audit Committee should each receive a 67% pay rise taking their total pay from £12,780 to £21,300.

In addition, they propose that the Chairs of the Planning and Licensing Committees should be awarded a 25% pay rise – up from £17,040 to £21,300.

This all follows on last month’s disgraceful decision from Labour when they controversially seized all the Overview & Scrutiny Chairmanships following their gains in the local elections. In other councils these important posts are normally shared between the political parties, on the basis that these committees exist to scrutinise the actions of the Cabinet – which are now all Labour in the case of Sefton Council.

Labour councillors scrutinising the decisions of Labour councillors – that’s going to be really effective, isn’t it?

So the really surprising news is that all seven councillors proposed to receive the massive pay rises are Labour.

My colleague Councillor Shaw comments: “I regard these massive pay rises as completely unacceptable. In fact, in this year’s budget Lib Dems proposed an average cut of 10% in the level of SRAs – extra allowances paid to senior councillors – but we were outvoted by the other two parties. At a time of continuing reductions in Sefton’s spending on vital services such a cut in councillors’ pay seemed to us to be the right thing to do, and we assumed that the Independent Remuneration Panel would be sympathetic to that viewpoint.”

“I simply cannot understand how the Panel have gone in exactly the opposite direction. I recognise that it is one of those classic thankless tasks that they face, but they really need to be asked to think again.”

“Such massive increases in pay to these seven Labour Chairs, taking them to over £21,000 per annum, means that that they would be paid more for performing a part-time, public service role, than the majority of local people earn through paid employment.”

The overwhelming majority of Sefton councillors – 50 out of 66 – receive only the Basic Allowance, which the Pay Panel has recommended to be remain frozen at £8,520 per annum following an earlier cut of 5%. Members have to meet the cost of travel and other expenses from within the Basic Allowance.

If you want to read the whole shocking detail, full details of the decision of the “Independent Remuneration Panel” meeting of 6 June are to be found (see Minute 7) at:

No comments:

Post a Comment

I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.