Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Pugh-Liberal Health Plans unfettered by Tories

That John Pugh has been deeply involved in the Health  and Social care debate is not news, but that he chose the week before Conference to publish an 'alternative to Lansley' will surprise some. The paper appeared on John's website last night and can be found in full here

Southport MP John Pugh has presented to Coalition Ministers an alternative to Andrew Lansley's Health Bill. The bill will be debated at this week's Lib Dem Spring Conference and in the Lords.

In a paper drafted by the MP he argues that should the government do a handbrake turn on the controversial bill, the alternative is not leaving the NHS in limbo.
Supporters of the bill argue that with many of the NHS organisations scheduled to be abolished by the Bill have already collapsed and that there is no way back.
John Pugh though proposes that the cluster groups of Primary Care Trusts that now temporarily run the local NHS could be the foundation for democratically controlled and clinically led Health Boards similar to those found in Northern Ireland. Such boards would control health and social care avoiding the expensive and disjointed shunting of elderly patients between the NHS and Social Services.
The MP states that he has received a very positive response to his proposals from clinical leaders and says:
"It is important that we map out a new direction for the NHS that does not repeat the tired old prescription of more competition and the futile effort to treat the country's health service like a market.
There needs to be  other alternatives to the Lansley proposals that are not just Lansley-lite or Blair Mark 2 or stagnation- alternatives that professionals can support. What I propose will not be without its critics but it will involve substantially less bureaucracy and upheaval than the government's current proposals."

No comments:

Post a Comment

I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.