Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Councillors-leading by example

Local Councils are setting their budgets. Everyone knows the belt is being tightened. One of the most usual refrains is that Councillors are protecting their own financial interests whilst inflicting pain on others. I speak at  a Leaders of the Opposition with one of the lowest allowance claims in any metropolitan authority. I regularly meet residents with want to see a reduction in Councillors' allowances and a reduction in the number of Councillors.

It would be folly to suggest that such adjustments would solve the budget issues with which we are  faced . It would be equal folly to suggest that even relatively small sums of money would not make a difference when it comes to , say, saving a Library-and our Labour Council are consulting on shutting every branch Library in Southport.

I have made it clear in public several times that I would not accept an increase in my allowances even if offered and that I believe that our relatively well paid Cabinet members should take a significant cut. It is equally clear to me that we should explore reducing the number of Councillors.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.