Wednesday, 19 September 2012

more on wealth redistribution

A couple of week ago I was discussing Liberal plans for the redistribution of wealth-in particular inheritance taxes. The vision of society that Liberals have promoted is one in which assets for fairly spread and that the unjustified accumulations of wealth in a few hands are dispersed. This one of the reasons Liberals championed Wealth taxes, and inheritance taxes. there were two other overlapping elements of this programme-employee ownership and land taxes. It should be noted that these are not seen as short term  measures for a crisis but part of a long term redistribution. We have dealt at length with employee ownership on this blog but have rather neglected land taxes (apart that is from the youtube video of the Land Song which has had well over 3 000 views) Anyway my old friend Alan Sherwell followed up my letter to the Times about inheritance tax with one about land taxes: 



Sir, It is interesting to connect two of the issues you are reporting on at the moment: wealth tax and green belt development.


If, regrettably, the Chancellor’s plan to allow green belt development goes ahead, some land owners will find that their previously low-value land becomes extremely valuable. The landowners will have done nothing to merit that significant increase in their wealth. Surely the community as a whole should benefit not an individual whose gain is purely by chance?  What better example could there be to support Professor Sandilands’s call for the taxation of land values?


Alan Sherwell
Aylesbury, Bucks 

No comments:

Post a Comment

I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.