Monday, 8 August 2011

more on: Time for more radical measures-our economic /industrial policy lacks hope and vision

Politics does not 'smell of hope and generosity' as it should for Liberals. The coalition policies for sustainable growth are predicated on a financing model that was -in large part -the cause of the market collapse that we are suffering.  No generation of  Liberals in the last century would have left out of their plans the radical restructuring of the ownership and control in industry. It is a prerequisite for sustainable growth as well as a crucial policy in spreading wealth, democracy and power in society.

As the resolution passed at the Liberal Joint Assembly of 1968 (reproduced below) asserts; the Party  'reject the traditional conception of the company or enterprise as being responsible to the interests of shareholders alone.  It believes that it must be replaced by a system in which employees become legal members of their companies.....                 





The second resolution passed the following year confirmed the Liberal Party view that this measure should be introduced compulsorily.
That workers should own and control their companies is a notion that goes back in Liberal thinking at least as far back as J S Mill. The Yellow Book (1928) has a whole chapter on the Diffusion of Ownership. This was a 'signature policy of the Liberal party'-it was about the only policy that the public knew, apart from PR.

In 1948 at the Blackpool Assembly the party had embraced the compulsory introduction of co-ownership. This redistribution of wealth was no longer to be voluntary or dependent on a benevolent owner giving the enterprise to their workers (as in the Scott Bader model)  It was proposed that  Company Law should be changed to give employee the right to be treated at least as equals of investors.

The man who promoted this policy more than most was Robert Oakeshott. I got an email from Michael Meadowcroft this week pointing me to Oakeshott's obituary in the Guardian.The blog has previously covered the obituaries in the Economist, Times and Telegraph. The Guardian recalls:

Robert Oakeshott, who has died aged 77, was the founder and for many years chief executive of Job Ownership Ltd (JOL), now the Employee Ownership Association. He championed the cause of worker co-operatives and employee ownership in the UK and around the world.
In the 1970s, Robert visited the successful Mondragón network of co-operatives in the Basque region of Spain. He recognised that Mondragón's success was due in part to the bank at the centre of its network, Caja Laboral, and particularly its consultancy division, the Empresarial. With this in mind, he founded, in 1979, the consultancy business JOL, a company limited by guarantee...................
JOL had a board of unpaid supporters and, for chairman, Robert's friend and admirer Lord (Jo) Grimond. In 1978, Robert published The Case for Workers' Co-ops, which Grimond described as "a book which all Liberals should read". The book identified successful co-ops across Europe. Robert was convinced that their strength was the motivation that comes from workers owning a share of equity. Teamwork, he said, calls for shared objectives, which is not the case where one part of income goes to labour in fixed wages and salaries, and the rest to capital. "It is surely impossible to believe," he wrote, "that rational and intelligent people, starting from scratch, would choose such a structure, when organising activities which depend on teamwork for their success."


Today when hedge funds and venture capitalists borrow vast sums of cash to take over companies, asset strip them and sell them on to the detriment of their work force and the local economy-look at Kraft and Cadbury's or BAA etc., we need to assert that it is absurd that our Industry should be run only in the interest of Investors. It is time to re-adopt the Liberal Party policy of employee ownership.

Now local Government is getting in on the act in an article on the Employee Ownership Association it writes:

The organisation was the brainchild of journalist, Robert Oakeshott, who died in June this year, aged 77, but who championed the cause of worker co-operatives.

His book entitled Jobs And Fairness is generally acknowledged as the definitive study on employee ownership in the UK and overseas. Educated at Tonbridge School, Kent, Mr Oakeshott won an exhibition to Balliol College, Oxford, where he studied classics, and graduated in 1957. His career as a journalist started on the Sunderland Echo, and he later moved to the Financial Times.

In the 1970s, he visited the highly-successful Mondragón network of co-operatives in the Basque region of Spain, and in 1978 published The Case For Workers’ Co-ops, which the former Liberal Party leader, Jo Grimond, described as ‘a book all Liberals should read’.






Resolutions reproduced from the Gladstone Club book 1978 compiled by Ian Hopton

1 comment:

  1. Funnily enough I was having a discussing about this very issue of co-operatives with one of my liberal friends last night. It's definitely an issue we should be championing more. Doing so might also have the advantage of persuading the co-operative movement to stop propping up the Labour party.

    Oh, and I hope you don't mind, but I've stolen your choice of Post a Comment words for my own blog ;)

    ReplyDelete

I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.