Saturday, 11 June 2011

"Post hoc, ergo propter hoc" -as West Wing fans might say

The wages of populism is U turns. Dear old Eric Pickles just couldn't resist playing to the gallery of Daily Mail readers whipping up a campaign to restore weekly bin collections. We have had the full range of scare stories in Sefton Tory leaflets-which is a tad surprising as they voted for the scheme and successive Tory spokesmen for that policy area on the Council have backed the plan. For several elections we had a Tory opponent who had this as a high priority.  Here in Sefton it would cost us about £7m to restore the collections, but as we offer weekly food waste collections so we are removing the key area of concern. I would find it hard to justify spending that amount of money at a time when we are cutting youth service spending, adult social services, library opening hrs etc.

Nevertheless the Daily Telegraph had a story proclaiming that Pickles was going to make good his campaign pledge. I don't know where the story came from or if it was a 'bloody surprise' to the Department. The Daily Mail was delighted. I guess Pickles was less so because he knew it was simply not going to happen. Today has come the reckoning and Conservative Home is predictably narked

We will have to wait until Tuesday when the Department publishes a report on waste disposal before the final rites can be read over this sad and misleading campaign. As the Mail reports today:
However on the key issue of restoring weekly bin collections it suggests that nothing will be offered. If true this would be a great disappointment. It points out that since the election the number of Councils only providing fortnightly collections has actually increase
I guess that there will be some highly disgruntled Tories who will feel badly let down and for some of the electors it will add to the cynicism.


  1. Going from the original weekly collections, which have been possible back to Victorian times< to fortnightly "green" ones cost more money at the time. Now we are told that going back will cost more more money.

    I think the parasites are lying to us. Going back could clearly save money & the politicians thus won't allow it.

  2. I did predict that there would be some disgruntled folk! My hunch is that if there had been anyway that Pickles could have got weekly collection reinstated he would have done. He simply came up against the financial reality,


I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.