Monday, 8 November 2010

Woolas looses first part of legal appeal

The Guardian has just posted this story:

The politician, who was also barred from standing for election for three years, was found to have deliberately lied about his Liberal Democrat rival in campaign literature.




He was quickly suspended by the Labour party, which said it would not support any subsequent legal battle to have the decision overturned.



Shamash said: "It is correct [that the judicial review request has been lost] but we are renewing it immediately. It was not about the substance, it was about the jurisdiction."



The judge decided that judicial review was not the appropriate course, he said.



"We say it is and we think he has got it wrong."



More details soon ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/nov/08/phil-woolas-loses-first-part-legal-battle?CMP=twt_fd

No comments:

Post a Comment

I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.