Wednesday, 27 January 2010

In Praise of Jackie Glover

People often think that politicians hate each other. They imagine that because we disagree about policies we can have no personal relationships. There are some folk like that who take everything personally. The must have real difficulty surviving. It is closer to the truth to say that politicians have politics in common and that sets them apart from most of the population!

I recall having long and interesting talks with people from other parties during the US Presidential election. We were all fascinated. We recognised the craft in the campaign and were all interested learn the lessons. There are lots of examples. It is in that context that I want to praise Jackie Glover.

In Praise of Jackie Glover

I do not for a moment imagine that she and I would agree on very much policy. She has had a difficult time and I have observed her response and I am impressed. The current Tory PPC has been described to me as a 'nightmare candidate'. In desperate circumstances -the belief that Gordon Brown was about to call a General Election -the Tories choose a local candidate who had the virtue of some recognition. The selection was carried(I understand) on the Chair's casting vote. There was no General Election and they were left with a candidate who would not have seen selected if folk had known there was 2yrs to go. In fact given what she said in the press in the run up to the selection she was content to stay as a Councillor and had no other ambitions. She has unravelled. She is a policy free zone-apart from hunting, gays and opposing redundancies in the Post Office-I can recall no policy statement. The number of expulsions, resignations, suspensions and spats suggest that her ability to work in a team is a difficulty. (Well that's the polite version -those on the naughty step put it more bluntly in private)

In these circumstances you need those with experience to rally round, put their arm around the novice candidate and give good advice. The trouble for the folk in Southport Tories is that the obvious candidates for that role have either been expelled, humiliated, left or 'knifed' I honestly think that this is because all things are seen as personal criticism. They are not seen as political problems but interpreted as personal hurts.

Some like Sir Ron have risen above it and kept his mouth shut-I have not traced a pledge of loyalty from him to the candidate. And then there is Jackie Glover. She and Tom have jointly 112 years of devoted service to the Tory Party. They are Tory to the core . It must distress them to see their candidate so obviously out of her depth. For them -and for lots of other Tories- they have certain expectations of a candidate. Read the letter that Ken Porter wrote to Tom-and which at least a couple of Tories leaked. Despite all the provocation Jackie has not commented. To her these are internal matters and you don't give the story 'legs' by talking about it. That is the' experienced' response, and that is why I admire her.

Now just for a moment reverse the positions. If Brenda had been on the receiving end of such a letter. I played that game with a Tory friend over the weekend. He suggested that everyone would know of her hurt, everyone one against her. She would be the victim.

In some ways the PPC is the victim. She-like Iain Duncan Smith-was asked to do a job for which she is obviously not suited. To be the chair of a constituency Party in those circumstances is not an enviable task.

1 comment:

  1. Considering what we would normally expect to be in the interests of a member of a party opposing the Tories, the fact that this article is entitled "In Praise Jackie Glover" really says it all about how valuable she is to their cause.


I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.